One of the things I have rarely done in these blogs is talk about myself. Or my neighbors and my friends. Or my views about politics, and how I got them.
There are good reasons. Modesty is not one, nor is shyness. The biggest is that I have spent more than half a century of working in a profession where you learn from day one that the reporter is never part of the story.
Readers aren’t supposed to care what you think. They aren’t even supposed to know what you think. You are invisible, except of course for your byline. What you write is based on facts, not your own opinions (exceptions, of course, for editorials).
Now this may seem quaint. a kind of Old School throwback. Today a lot of what passes for news is strictly opinion. Newspapers are no longer the main source of information in our nation - or in our world - and our computers see what blogs and news feeds decide to give us. They look at our searches and downloads and feed us more of the same.
What bleeds still leads in the papers and on cable, but angry people are also really popular. And, if you agree with what they are angry about, you get more and more of it. The commentators who get the most views (and make the most money) are the ones who their audience - read that as “you” - identify with, and that makes their opinion the real story.
But keeping myself out of the story is what I believed when I first started as a reporter, and I still mostly believe it. People should get fair, honest information and make up their own minds about it. Did they always agree with my stories? Of course not. Did they even read the entire story? Certainly not all of them.
But enough of that. Back to me. You want to know how I - a proud liberal former reporter living in a rather conservative Republican county - get along with my friends and neighbors, who have a different opinion about most things.
Well, mostly I do what everyone else does in this situation. I ignore it and hope things will someday get better. I call it taking the long view - the Republican Party is suffering from dry rot, has given up most of its principles in a deal with the Devil to gain power, and its long-term future resembles a great, growing mass of lemmings headed toward a cliff.
First Things First
Why am I writing this? It’s tempting to do, of course. And since no one is paying me, I can write whatever I want. But, the biggest reason is my older daughter, who pointed out that it was long past time for me to put something of myself in my blog.
She turned out to be a better writer than me, is smarter than me in a lot of ways, and has a really good eye for social justice and order. And, she pointed out that not writing about myself violates one of the prime rules of writing - write about what you know. Besides, in some way, it brings this blog back in balance a bit. Too much objectivity and not enough personal reflection kind of distorts it.
All the nerds who really appreciated my recent article on how the government calculates economic growth and what it means please stand up. Going to the bathroom right now does not count. That was one of my recent blogs. And probably one of the least popular. Nothing about myself in it, and it probably bored a lot of people.
So, let me talk a bit about me, and my opinions. Which may, in its own way, turn out to be just as boring. Consider yourself warned.
Short Answer Now, Longer Answers Later
You might think I am distressed and angry about the way our nation and state and county and town are going. Also our school district, our park districts, the Suffolk County Water Authority and the volunteer fire department. And the library, the reconstruction of the roads around my town, and a lot of other things.
I am not, not really. It’s more a kind of resignation, that things will get keep getting bad until they get better. And I see signs that the change has already started.
Some perspective. I am old enough to be an original Trekie, and I believe in the wisdom of Mr. Spock. I think it should apply to our government, and that our current government has turned it on its head. What wisdom, you ask? - The good of the many outweighs the good of the few. Or the one. Certainly the American Revolution was not fought to make the few rich people in our nation richer.
Now there is a caveat - if you have to make someone suffer for the good of all - like the people living near a new parking garage or town dump site - you have to try and do something to make up for the damage. Like fund better schools for the distressed community. Build some parks. Provide public transportation. Things like that.
You want to let companies sell cut-rate health insurance for people who can’t afford anything else - well get ready to build a lot of new health clinics and pour lots more money into hospitals that will have to treat people without proper coverage. Things like that.
Somewhat Longer Answer.
You might think I fight with my neighbors who put up Republican lawn signs and don’t really think very much about what it means. Just supporting their team with it’s hard-edged realism. Our tax dollars are going to the moochers. You know, the people who set up off-shore bank accounts and increase low-interest loans to automate and reduce jobs.
Well, I just don’t fight with them. I have learned, many times over, that you can almost never change anyone’s mind once an opinion has settled in and grown roots. There are lots of Republicans who proudly say they never voted for a Democrat in their life, and there are lots of Democrats who proudly say they never voted for a Republican in their life.
Let’s be fair. Both are like those lemmings, just waiting to be led off a cliff. Hoo-ray for the undecideds, those independents who never seem to make up their minds until a week or two before an election. That’s another belief that I have turned on its head.
No, I don’t fight with people who will just dig in their heels if you ask them why they believe what they believe. Smart ones come up with lots of reasons - most of them half-truths and some of them just wrong - and show a surprising degree of creativity in justifying how they feel. Sometimes, they make things up, but mostly they just repeat things other people have made up. I call it the “talk radio effect.” I would tweet that sometime, if I believed in twitter.
Don’t just trust me on this. Look it up yourself. Lots of studies have been done on opinions, and people just don’t retain facts that contradict what they believe.
Don’t believe in climate change? Well, you will soon spout lots of views from people who have questioned one thing or another about climate change, or who just say there isn’t enough information yet. Or, that it is just nature taking its course. All talking points of climate deniers, or people who own a lot of stock in traditional energy companies.
So, I just don’t argue. It doesn’t get me anywhere. Besides, you can’t spend your life - or even a good part of it - thinking snarky thoughts about people who disagree with you. Or who won’t take the time - or don’t have the ability - to really analyze what they hear. Quick, raise your hand if you have read an issue of Scientific American in the past year. Anybody. Either side.
Let The Deep Dive Begin
I don’t believe in absolute moral purity either. I do believe that people who do evil are evil - especially when they are in power - but I also know that good people can do bad things and that bad people can do good things. So, I don’t put people who disagree with me in the deplorable basket. But, I do despise anyone who supports the abomination of our detaining children and separating them from their parents.
Here’s a good test to see if you have fallen off the objectivity wagon. If you can’t actually articulate what the person you disagree with believes - and they may not be able to clearly state it themselves - then you are a little lacking in understanding.
Just look at any two people arguing over the kneeling protests by football players. Bet you that neither of them could sit down and write a paper - and it must be at least 1,000 words - expressing why they feel the way they do. I could, but you won’t find me arguing it. One quick comment, maybe two, and that is enough to show if I am talking to someone who can change their opinion. Usually, it is futile.
Want to waste an hour of your life? Try to change the mind of someone who has overlooked the fact that ever since we started filling the air with fumes from coal fires - we are talking the Industrial Revolution here - and since the world’s population started exploding, man’s effect on the climate has been getting bigger and bigger.
Forests became fields. Fields became orderly farms, and the methane from millions of cows - which were not needed when there were a few less billion people to feed - created their own environmental problems.
Or, just look at the seashore. Ask some old-timer how big the beach was when they were a kid. Or just look at the Montauk lighthouse, which was about 300 feet from the edge of a cliff when it was built in 1796 - our new nation’s first public works project - and is now only about 100 feet from the ocean, with raging debates going on about how to keep it from eventually falling into the sea.
Easy to overlook, right?
Just A Few More Pages, If You Want To Read Them
Now, one of my great pleasures in life is playing games. Mostly board games and games with little toy figures, mostly lovingly-painted metal miniatures. I play Candy Land with my grandchildren, and played a whole lot of games with my kids growing up. When I go visit some friends in New Jersey, I bring a game or two to play with their grandchildren.
I started playing war games decades ago. To explain briefly, a good war game shows what happened in a battle, and also shows what might have happened. The games got better over the years - more accurate, more analytical, better production values - and my gaming expanded. Now I play games where you win by building cities, or gathering resources, or fighting space battles with decks of cards. I have one where you get points for healing a sick pig.
My metal miniature games go everywhere, from recreating a Revolutionary War battle to naval combat in World War II. Dungeons and Dragons is still popular too.
A few weeks ago I was crawling through the sewers of Paris trying to discover why it was backing up. Giant ants and monsters, naturally. Our party had dynamite to blow up the obstruction, but the tunnel was dark and someone had to hold a torch so the guy with the dynamite knew where to put it.
Boom. A heroic death.
The point is that I play with people who don’t share my opinions, on politics or a whole range of other things. But our little group does all share a common bond - we all love gaming. And, it can be hard to find a group of gamers to meet every Wednesday or Friday night.
So, the Trump supporters don’t talk about Trump. The Trump haters don’t talk about him either. And, our games go on. Each side agrees to put politics to the side for a couple of hours. It mostly works. See how easy it is to get along with people.
Why Reporters See Things Differently
Of course I have opinions on a lot of things. But, I also have a lot of practice in doing something most other people don’t. You can’t write an objective story unless you see both sides of an issue - or three or four sides, if needed - and you can’t see those sides unless you can actually understand what both sides are saying.
It may be why I rarely act on a knee-jerk reaction, unless I am yelling at something on a TV screen. Usually, things in real life are too complicated to tweet about.
You can’t be a good reporter if you start out believing one side is good and the other is bad. You can quote people saying one side is mistaken, or what they propose will create real problems for a lot of people. But, you also try to prove that by finding facts, not by spouting opinions. And you have to give the people you may not agree with the same chance to explain things.
That, sadly, is not happening in our political discourse. Tell a Trump supporter that what they believe was crafted by the Russians, and he or she will laugh in your face and say they never even met a Russian.
Tell a Democrat that the party rigged the election in a lot of ways to stop Bernie Sanders, and they will tell you that is all a lie. Or a really big mistake. They will also insist Hillary only lost because the other side cheated, not because she ran a lousy campaign.
See, our nation has achieved equality at last.
My own opinion - just wait for it - is that both the Republican and the Democratic parties are suffering from a political hardening of the arteries. Neither party has any vision to offer our nation to deal with its big problems. Republicans have the added problem of squandering the enormous political power and the luck which gave them total control of our government by pushing tax cuts that don’t help the working class and abandoning most of their core ideas - picking winners and losers in our supposed free market economy, watching the federal deficit grow faster than under the Democrats and giving up all claim that the President should be a moral leader.
The Democrats, on the other hand, have wasted nearly two years in trying to figure out what they stand for in a post-Obama era, and having absolutely no idea on what to spend their political capital on if and when when they get back into power again.
Wrapping It All Up
So, I tend to keep my opinion to myself - this blog is a great safety valve - but I think I also have a kind of clarity from all those years of trying to see every side of a problem. By training and instinct, I go deeper into things. It makes you a cynic, and it explains why people in my profession tend to be called know-it-alls.
Here’s an example. An adorable little girl, eight or nine years old, blonde with a pony tail, is riding her bike in the street and is hit by a car. Broken arm. Crying mother. Complaints about speeding on her quiet residential street. OK, not really a big story. It happens a lot.
(There are between 40,000 and 50,000 people hurt in bicycle accidents in our nation every year, and two people die in bike accidents every day).
Now let’s say the mother has a friend who knows how to organize. They protest at the accident site demanding a stop sign be put up. They keep doing it until it gets on cable television or in their local newspaper. Some teenagers post a video. And, eventually, they go to town hall to demand action.
So, what is a heartless reporter to do. Nice picture of the kid with her arm in a cast, and her younger sister holding a teddy bear.
Do you point out that these good people really want four other stop signs as well, to slow traffic on their entire block. Or that doing it will simply shift all that traffic to some other local street? Or that there is a state law that says stop signs are only justified when there is enough traffic, and are supposed to stop traffic coming from a quiet street before it enters a busier road.
Should you call a traffic expert who will tell you that the more stop signs there are, the more likely some drivers will just speed through them, which will actually increase accidents? Should you ask if other neighborhoods with worse traffic problems should be first in line to get a stop sign? Should you even point out that you just don’t put a stop sign up - you need a traffic engineer’s study first. Should you ask about the cost?
Well, there is an answer to that one, too. “If it saves the life of just one child, then it’s worth it!” In which case, shouldn’t there be a stop sign on every street corner in the county? Or are some lives worth more than others?
Or would all that money be better spent saving lives some other way, such as reducing one of our worst national disgraces, am infant mortality rate just over six deaths for every 1,000 births. It’s the highest rate of any of the 27 wealthiest in the world (Finland and Japan are the lowest, at 2.3). If you really want to make a difference, spend a good chunk of that stop sign money for pre-natal care in states like Alabama (8.7 deaths per 1,000 births) or Mississippi. That’s the worst state, with 9.6 deaths per 1,000 births, which puts it between Botswana and Bahrain.
See why I tend to keep my opinions to myself? They just take too long to explain.